Andorra had excellent
promise, especially with its compelling start and jacket cover description. I
was immediately intrigued by the unlikable, but interestingly strange characters.
I was excited to learn more of Mr. Dent's escape. I wanted to watch the
unfolding of the Alex's relationship with Jean. I was hoping to discover more
details of Nancy's seedy past and present. Yet, sadly these story lines were
glossed over as the book continued. Then the end meandered, causing me to
question what exactly I read. I dislike taking time with a book to feel as
if I did not follow or comprehend its meaning. I feel as if I missed something
crucial especially with the rave reviews from fans and praise from critics. Why
the harbor murders? Why was Alex a suspect? Why did Cameron not develop this
plot line further when it could have solidified some of the story? Why the
confession? Why create interesting characters but only develop them
superficially? Why recreate the geography of Andorra? (In reality Andorra is
a landlocked country in the Pyrenees.) Why not choose a coastal,
Mediterranean town in Italy for example? Why are the story and its characters
so disconnected? If you are a reader who needs closure or to be provided more
concrete answers, this book may not satisfy. Even with all of these critiques I
would not discourage this book. It was oddly entertaining. Ultimately, more
elaboration would have had me better satisfied, but maybe I need to take the perspective that the book is a bit like participating in someone else's dream.
What’s next on the reading list?
No comments:
Post a Comment